Vol. 46 No. 12 (2016)
ECOLOGY AND ECONOMY

Transaction Costs in Natural Resource Governance: Survey of International Approaches

I. Glazyrina
Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, SB RAS, Transbaikal State University
Bio

Published 2018-07-15

Keywords

  • TRANSACTION COSTS,
  • ECOLOGICAL-ECONOMIC POLICY,
  • INSTITUTIONAL SOLUTIONS,
  • PATH-DEPENDENCE

How to Cite

1.
Glazyrina И. Transaction Costs in Natural Resource Governance: Survey of International Approaches. ECO [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];46(12):165-79. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/1618

Abstract

The article describes the main approaches to the problem of transaction costs in the governance of natural resources in modern ecological economics literature which are defined as the cost management of socio-ecological-economic systems.. The most important is the question of how transaction costs, their magnitude, nature and distribution between actors can influence the achievement of sustainable development of countries and regions.

References






1.

Garrick D., McCann L., Pennel J. Transaction costs and environmental policy: Taking stock, looking forward//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 182-184.





2.

Coase R. H. The problem of social cost. 726//Journal of Law and Economics, 1960. -№ 3. -Р. 1-44.





3.

Бобылев С. Н., Захаров В. М. Экосистемные услуги и экономика. -М.: ООО Типография ЛЕВКО, Ин-т устойчивого развития/Центр экологической политики России, 2009. -72 с.





4.

Farley J. Ecosystem services: The economic debate//Ecosystem services. -2012. -Vol.1. -P. 40-49.





5.

Wallis J. J., North D. C. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970//In: Engerman S. L. and Gallman R. E. (eds). Long-term Factors in American Economic Growth. Univ. of Chicago Press. -1986. -Р. 95-161.





6.

Marshall G. Transaction costs, collective action and adaptation in managing complex social-ecological systems//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 185-194.





7.

Литвинцева Г. П., Гахова Н. А. Динамика трансакционного сектора в экономике: как учил Д. Норт//Journal of Institutional Studies. -2016. -Т. 8. -№ 2. -С. 38-50.





8.

Шаститко А. А. Новая институциональная экономическая теория. -М.: ТЕИС, 2010. -848 с.





9.

Ostrom E. Coping with tragedies of the commons//Annual Review of Political Science. -1999. -Vol. 2. -P. 493-535.





10.

Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems//Science. -2009. -Vol. 325. -P. 419-422.









11. Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed//The Economist. -1998. -Vol. 146 (3). -P. 23-58.
12. Coggan A., Whitten S. M., Bennett J. Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy//Ecological Economics. -2010. -Vol. 69. -P. 1777-1784.
13. Garrick D., Whitten S., Coggan A. Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: A transaction costs analysis framework//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 195-205.
14. Krutilla K., Krause R. Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment framework and literature review. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. -2010. -№ 4. -Р. 261-354.
15. McCann L., Colby B., Easter K. W., Kasterine A., Kuperan K. V. Transaction costs measurement for evaluating environmental policies//Ecological Economics. -2005. -Vol. 52 (4). -P. 527-542.
16. Ofei-Mensah A., Bennett J. Transaction costs of alternative greenhouse gas policies in the Australian transport energy sector//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 214-221.
17. Pannell D. J., Roberts A., Park G., Alexander J. Improving environmental decisions: A transaction cost story//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 244-252.
18. Комкова А. А., Шаститко А. Е. Количественная оценка трансакционного сектора: возможности, ограничения, результаты//Научные исследования экономического факультета. Эл. журнал. -2014. -Т. 6. -№ 3. -С. 25-48.
19. Рюмина Е. В. Экологическая версия предназначения природной ренты//Экономическая наука современной России. -2001. -№ 2. -С. 11-22.
20. Рюмина Е. В. Экономический ущерб от экологических правонарушений//Российская акад. наук, Ин-т проблем рынка. -М., 2009. Сер.: Экономическая наука современной России.
21. Крюков В. А. Сырьевые территории в новой институциональной реальности//Пространственная экономика. -2014. -№ 4. -С. 26-60.
22. McCann L. Transaction costs and environmental policy design//Ecological Economics. -2013. -Vol. 88. -P. 253-262.
23. Аузан А. А. Эффект колеи. Проблема зависимости от траектории предшествующего развития -эволюция гипотезы//Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. -2015. -№ 1. -С. 3-17.
24. Нуреев Р. М. Россия после кризиса -эффект колеи//Journal of Institutional Studies. -2010. -Т. 2. -№ 2. -С. 7-26.
25. Blueprints for an integration of science, technology and environmental policy (BLURPRINT). Mannheim. -ZEW. -2004.
26. Hanna S. Efficiencies of user participation in natural resource management. In: Hanna, S., Munasinghe, M. (Eds.), Property Rights and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economic and the World Bank. -Washington, 1995. D.C. P. 59-67.
27. Challen R. Institutions, Transaction Costs and Environmental Policy: Institutional Reform for Water Resources. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, 2000.
28. Heinmiller В. Т. Path dependency and collective action in common pool governance//International Journal of the Commons. -2009. -№ 3 (1). -Р. 131-147.
29. Quiggin J. Uncertainty, awareness and the precautionary principle. Presentation to the Symposium on Progress and Problems in Measuring Sustainable Development. -2008. -4 Ap. University of Sydney (Online: http://sydney.edu.au/agriculture/documents/harris_symposium/Quiggin_precautionary0804.pdf).
30. Полтерович В. М. Элементы теории реформ. -М.: Экономика, 2007. -447с.
31. Гирусов Э. В., Бобылев С. Н., Новоселов А. Л., Чепурных Н. В. Экология и экономика природопользования. -М.: Юнити, 1998.
32. Corbera E. Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payment for ecosystem services//Current options in Environmental sustainability. -2012. -Vol. 4. -P. 612-619.
33. Batie S. S. Wicked problems and applied economics//American Journal of Agricultural Economics. -2008. -№ 90 (5). -Р. 1176-1191.
34. Vatn A. Institutions and The Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing. Chaltenham, UK, 2005. -451 p.
35. Глазырина И. П., Михеев И. Е., Элоян А. Ю. Экономика россыпного золота: доходы, трансакционные издержки и охрана природных систем//Материалы Всеросс. конф. с межд. участием Эволюция биосферы и техногенез. -Чита, 2016. ИПРЭК СО РАН. -С. 25-28 .
36. Daly H., Farley J. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. -Washington: Island Press, 2003. -450 p.
37. Забелина И. А., Клевакина Е. А. ЭКОномическое развитие и негативное воздействие на окружающую среду в регионах трансграничного взаимодействия//ЭКО. -2016. -№ 8 (506). -С. 67-82.
38. URL: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-05/05/c_1115187518.htm (дата обращения: 22.05.2015).
39. URL: http://m.russian.china.org.cn/russian/doc_1_26350_354805.html (дата обращения: 22.09.2016).