Vol. 50 No. 1 (2020)
Тема номера: ГЧП: От доминирования к доверию

Public-Private Partnership in the Real Dimension

V. Nefedkin
National Research Novosibirsk State University, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Bio
O. Fadeeva
National Research Novosibirsk State University, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Bio

Published 2020-01-03

Keywords

  • public-private partnership,
  • municipal-private partnership,
  • quasi-PPP,
  • regional budgets,
  • comparative advantage,
  • PPP project evaluation,
  • PSC,
  • value for money,
  • VFM
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

1.
Nefedkin В, Fadeeva О. Public-Private Partnership in the Real Dimension. ECO [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 3 [cited 2024 Sep. 26];50(1):8-28. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/3948

Abstract

The idea of PPP as a way to attract private capital to socially significant projects in modern Russian realities is losing its relevance. The available data fail to provide a complete picture of the scale and dynamics of real business participation in PPP projects, as they lack statistics of actually implemented investments. Trends in formation and distribution of tax revenues observed in 2014-2018 objectively reduce the investment potential of private businesses and households. The continued centralization of tax revenues in upper level budgets contributes to growing attractiveness of joint public-private projects for regional and local authorities as an additional channel for attracting budget funds. Defects in the regulatory system create additional barriers to successful application of PPP. Legislative innovations in this area as well as creating new opportunities also introduce additional restrictions. An example of such a restriction is mandatory assessment of comparative advantage of PPP projects in relation to available alternatives. From an institutional point of view, examples of cooperation between government and business in “non-classical” quasi-PPPs are interesting. The analysis of two cases based on projects implemented in the Novosibirsk academic Park and in one of the rural areas of the Tomsk region gives an idea of potential results and risks for their participants, as well as external effects arising from the use of informal contracts in relations between local authorities and business.

References

  1. Гоосен Е. В., Никитенко С. М., Пахомова Е. О. Опыт реализации проектов ГЧП в России // ЭКО. 2015. № 2 (488). С. 163–175.
  2. Завьялова Е. Б., Ткаченко М. В. Проблемы и перспективы применения механизмов государственно-частного партнерства в отраслях социальной сферы // Вестник РУДН. Серия Экономика. 2018. Vol. 26. № 1. С. 61–75.
  3. Завьялова Е. Б., Шаманина Э. А. Обзор монографий, пособий и рекомендаций в области развития и применения механизма государственно-частного партнерства // Государственно-частное партнерство. 2016. Т. 3. № 3. С. 201–212.
  4. Нефёдкин В. И., Фадеева О. П., Гинзбург Д. Р. Концессии в теплоснабжении: инвестиции вместо субсидий // ЭКО. 2019. № 3. С. 37–56.
  5. Обоснование эффективности применения механизмов ГЧП. Экспертный релиз. Сентябрь, 2017 г. / Национальный Центр государственно-частного партнерства.
  6. Пастуханов А. Е. Частное финансирование ГЧП проектов в России: возможности и риски // ЭКО. 2018. № 8. С. 113–132.
  7. Просто и честно об инвестициях в инфраструктуру и государственно-частном партнерстве в России. Аналитический обзор / Национальный Центр государственно-частного партнерства. 2019. URL: http://pppcenter.ru/assets/docs/reit240419.pdf.
  8. Competitive Neutrality Maintaining a level playing field between public and private business. OECD2012 URL: https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/50302961.pdf
  9. Grimsey D., Lewis M. Are Public Private Partnerships Value for Money? Evaluating Alternative Approaches and Comparing Academic and Practitioner / Accounting Forum, December 2005. 29 (4). Рp. 345–378.
  10. Ismail K., Takim R., Nawawi A. H. A public sector comparator (PSC) for value for money (VFM) assessment tools // Asian Social Science. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 7. Pp. 192–201. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n7p192
  11. Markovskaya E., Holodkova V., Radushinsky D. Public-Private Partnerships: Does Russian Practice Follow International Experience? // Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы. 2019. № 13(2). С. 104–113. doi: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.13.2.2019.104–113.