ISSN (print) - 0131-7652

ISSN (online) - 2686-7605

Vol. 53 No. 10 (2023)
ECONOMY SECTORS AND MARKETS

Reputation Factor in Public Procurement from the Viewpoint of Customers and Suppliers

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (Русский) (RUB 100)
  • M.K. Emelianova,
  • A.A. Yakovlev
M.K. Emelianova
Institute for Industrial and Market Studies; National Research University Higher School of Economics
A.A. Yakovlev
Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Harvard University, MA, USA
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-10-137-153

Published 2023-09-29

Keywords

  • public procurement; reputation; procurement efficiency; public buyers; suppliers; trust; competitive environment

How to Cite

1.
Emelianova М, Yakovlev А. Reputation Factor in Public Procurement from the Viewpoint of Customers and Suppliers. ECO [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 Jun. 30];53(10):137-53. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4671

Abstract

The paper reveals the role of reputation in the Russian public procurement system. Based on a survey of public customers and suppliers, it is shown that experienced market participants attach importance to both the reputation of contractors and their own reputation. Suppliers and customers agree on the most important factors of suppliers’ reputation, but their opinions differ when interpreting customers’ reputation. In the study we confirm on Russian data the conclusions of foreign authors about the contribution of suppliers’ reputation in improving procurement efficiency. It also shows the role of reputation of government customers in this, which has been little studied in the literature. We explain the results obtained in the context of customers’ solution of the problem of simultaneous assurance of both procurement quality and competition.
Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (Русский) (RUB 100)

References

  1. Вольчик В.В. Эволюция институциональной структуры размещения государственного заказа в России // Вопросы регулирования экономики. 2011. Т. 2. № . 2. С. 56–67.
  2. Конов A.В., Бегтин И.Д., Горбачева Н.Г., Добровольская А., Маскалева О.С. Система государственных закупок в России: конкуренция против качества?/ Под ред. М. Комина; Центр перспективных управленческих решений. М.: ЦПУР; Антикоррупционный центр НИУ ВШЭ, 2019. 64 с.
  3. Мельников В.В. Электронные госзакупки: год спустя // ЭКО. 2012. № . 5 (455). С. 174–187. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2012–5–174–189
  4. Мельников В.В. Проблема оппортунизма в государственных закупках // Journal of institutional studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2013. Т. 5. № . 3. С. 114–124.
  5. Механизмы регулирования экономических процессов в условиях цифровой трансформации: международный, национальный, региональный уровни: Монография / Под ред. И.Д. Тургель. Екатеринбург: Издательство Уральского университета, 2022. 106 с.
  6. Яковлев А., Аллилуева О., Кузнецова И., Шамрин А., Юдкевич М., Якобсон Л. Система госзакупок: на пути к новому качеству // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 6. С. 88–107. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2010–6–88–107
  7. Яковлев А.А., Балаева О.Н., Родионова Ю.Д., Ткаченко А.В. Проблемы и эффективность госзакупок глазами их участников // Всероссийский экономический журнал ЭКО. 2020. № . 11 (557). С. 83–103. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131–7652–2020–11–83–103.
  8. Яковлев А.А., Ткаченко А.В., Емельянова М.К., Балаева О.Н. Репутация и доверие в российской системе госзакупок // Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2022. Т. 14. № . 1. С. 89–107. DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2022.14.1.086–099.
  9. Bernstein L. Beyond relational contracts: Social capital and network governance in procurement contracts // Journal of Legal Analysis. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 561–621. DOI: 10.1093/jla/law001
  10. Decarolis F., Spagnolo G., Pacini R. Past performance and procurement outcomes. // National Bureau of Economic Research. 2016. No. w22814. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w22814 (дата обращения: 12.07.2023).
  11. De Clercq D., Rangarajan D. The role of perceived relational support in entrepreneur–customer dyads // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008. Vol. 32. No. 4. Pp. 659–683. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6520.2008.00247.x
  12. Flynn A. Re-thinking SME disadvantage in public procurement. // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2017. Vol. 24. No. 4. Pp. 991–1008. DOI: 10.1108/jsbed-03–2017–0114
  13. Jing J. Myers L.A., Ng J., Su L. Customer referencing and capital market benefits: Evidence from the cost of equity // Contemporary Accounting Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/1911–3846.12850.
  14. Lamothe M., Lamothe S. To Trust or Not to Trust? What Matters in Local Government-Vendor Relationships? // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2012. Vol. 22. No. 4. Pp. 867–892. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur063
  15. MacLeod W.B. Reputations, relationships, and contract enforcement. // Journal of economic literature. 2007. Vol. 45. No. 3. Pp. 595–628. DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.3.595
  16. Picci L. Reputation-based governance / Stanford University Press, 2011. 240 p.
  17. Spagnolo G. Reputation, competition, and entry in procurement // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2012. Vol. 30. No. 3. Pp. 291–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.01.001
  18. Vanneste B.S., Gulati R. Generalized trust, external sourcing, and firm performance in economic downturns // Organization Science. 2022. Vol. 33. No. 4. Pp. 1599–1619. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1500

Most read articles by the same author(s)