Cover story: Alaska – Both Near and Far
Analyzing Interrelations between Sustainable Development Goals: a Regional Aspect
Published 2025-10-06
Keywords
- sustainable development; SDGs; region; assessment; interconnection; synergy
How to Cite
1.
Alferova Т, Shimanovsky Д. Analyzing Interrelations between Sustainable Development Goals: a Regional Aspect. ECO [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 6 [cited 2025 Oct. 8];55(5):7-21. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4895
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the study of interdependencies between the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the regions on the example of the Volga and Ural Federal Districts. The interdependencies were established as a result of preliminary localization of global-level goals in the regions (based on contextual analysis of scientific literature) and calculation of integral indices for each of them by the method of pair correlation. The obtained results revealed synergies and trade-offs between some goals that can either multiply or neutralize efforts to achieve other goals, which should be taken into account when forming regional policies that support the nationwide perspective of SDG implementation.References
- Алферова Т.В. Локализация целей устойчивого развития на примере регионов Приволжского и Уральского федеральных округов // ЭКО. 2022. № 10. С. 148–167. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2022–10–148–167
- Алферова Т.В. Когнитивное моделирование устойчивого развития регионов // Проблемы устойчивости развития социально-экономических систем: Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции, Тамбов, 24 ноября 2021 года. Тамбов: Издательский дом «Державинский», 2021. С. 501–505. EDN VWUKFQ.
- Бобылев С.Н., Кудрявцева О.В., Соловьева С.В., Ситкина К.С. Индикаторы экологически устойчивого развития: региональное измерение // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. 2018. № 2. С. 21–33.
- Бобылев С.Н. Индикаторы устойчивого развития для России // Вестник МГГУ им. М.А. Шолохова. Социально-экологические технологии. 2012. № 1. С. 8–18. EDN PHDDYH.
- Винокуров А.И. Оценка рисков формирования дискреционных затрат в строительных компаниях Российской Федерации // Вестник Алтайской академии экономики и права. 2021. № 1–1. С. 24–27. DOI 10.17513/vaael.1565
- Alcamo, J. et al., (2020). Analysing interactions among the sustainable development goals: fndings and emerging issues from local and global studies. Sustainability Science. No. 15. Рр. 1561–1572.
- Anderson, C. et al. (2022). A systems model of SDG target infuence on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainability Science. No. 17. Рр. 1459–1472.
- Barbier, E., Burgess, J.C. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and the systems approach to sustainability. Economics Discussion Papers. No. 2017–28, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel.
- Bojtor, A., Czippán, K. (2019). The Synergies of the Sustainable Development Goals and the Good State and Governance Report in Hungary. Available at: https://www.nispa.org/files/conferences/2019/e-proceedings/system_files/papers/the-synergies-bojtor.pdf (accessed 10.02.2024).
- Cling, J-P., Delecourt, C. (2022). Interlinkages between the Sustainable Development Goals. World Development Perspectives. No. 25. Pp. 1–18.
- Filho, M.G., et al. (2022). The Relationship between Circular Economy, Industry 4.0 and Supply Chain Performance: A Combined ISM/Fuzzy MICMAC Approach. Sustainability. No. 14, 2772.
- Folke, C. et al. (2016). Social- ecological resilience and bio-sphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society. No. 21(3):41. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748–210341 (accessed: 20.01.2023).
- Jain, A., Courvisanos, J., Subramaniam, N. (2021). Localisation of the Sustainable Development Goals in an emerging nation. Public Administration and Development. No. 41(1). Рр. 1–13.
- Karnib, A. (2017). A Quantitative Nexus Approach to Analyze the Interlinkages across the Sustainable Development Goals. Lebanese University, Hadath Campus, Baabda, Lebanon. Online Published: September 29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n5p173 (accessed 15.01.2023).
- Karnib, A. (2017b). Mapping the direct and indirect interlinkages across the sustainable development goals: A qualitative nexus approach. International Journal of Development and Sustainability. Vol. 6. No. 9. Pр. 1150–1158.
- Laumann, F., et al. (2022). Complex interlinkages, key objectives, and nexuses among the Sustainable Development Goals and climate change: a network analysis. Lancet Planet Health. Vol. 6 (5). Pp. e422–е430.
- Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development. No. 23(3). Pp. 176–187.
- Miola, A., Borchardt, S., Neher, F., Buscaglia, D. (2019). Interlinkages and policy coherence for the Sustainable Development Goals implementation: An operational method to identify trade-offs and co-benefits in a systemic way, EUR29646 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN978–92–79–99556–9, DOI:10.2760/472928, JRC115163
- Oliveira A., Calili R., M.F. Almeida, Sousa М.A. (2019). Systemic and Contextual Framework to Define a Country’s 2030 Agenda from a Foresight Perspective. Sustainability. No. 11. 6360. Pp. 1–28. DOI:10.3390/su11226360
- Scharlemann, J.P.W., et al. (2020). Towards understanding interactions between Sustainable Development Goals: the role of environment–human linkages. Sustainability Science. No. 15. Рр. 1573–1584.
- Shin, N., Park, S. (2019). Evidence-Based Resilience Management for Supply Chain Sustainability: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach. Sustainability. No. 11(2): 484. DOI:10.3390/su11020484
- Weitz, N, Carlsen, H, Nilsson, M, Skånberg, K. (2018). Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability Science. No. 13(2). Pp.1–29.