Cover story: Transportation: Risks of Disintegration
Published 2022-08-30
Keywords
- Russia; China; railway; Arctic; port; infrastructure
How to Cite
1.
Moe А. “Belkomur” and the Role of China. ECO [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];52(9):8-33. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4502
Abstract
The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south – north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. China has shown increasing interest in Arctic shipping over the past ten years. The construction of a railway from the Urals, with connections to China, to a deep-water port with access to the Arctic Ocean appeared attractive, both as a strategic opportunity for China and as a natural area for Chinese engagement in Russia, given announcements of the close partnership and common interests between the two countries. Since 2012 various Chinese companies have shown interest in investing, and the conclusion of a concession agreement has been announced several times. The Russian federal authorities have voiced support, without committing budget funding. Increasingly, however, critical remarks have been heard from the federal government, although regional support remains strong. As of early 2022 no firm agreement had been signed, and the project was put on hold. Reviewing the history of the project since Chinese companies were first engaged, this article offers insights on Russian regional authorities’ scope for maneuvre and the relationship between central and regional power. It also reveals Russian misinterpretations of Chinese interest in the project.References
- Гудев П. А. Новые риски и возможности межгосударственного сотрудничества в Арктике // Арктика и Север. 2019. № 36. С. 57–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17238 / issn2221–2698.2019.36.57
- Куратова Е. С. Железнодорожная магистраль «Белкомур» – сухопутная альтернатива Северного морского пути // Транспортное дело России. 2011. № 9. С. 88–90.
- Леонов С. Активизация политики Китая в Арктике: предпосылки, проблемы, перспективы // Регионалистика. 2019. № 6 (5). DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.5.50
- Мое, А. Новая политика России в отношении Северного морского пути? Государственные интересы, основные заинтересованные стороны и экономические возможности в меняющиеся времена // Полярный журнал. 2020. № 10 (2). С. 209–227. DOI: 10.1080 / 2154896X.2020.1799611
- Петровский В. Ж. и Филиппова Л. В. Стратегия Китая по освоению Арктики и перспективы российско-китайского сотрудничества в регионе // Китай в мировой и региональной политике. История и современность. Вып. XXIII: ежегодное изд. / Отв. ред. Е. И. Сафронова. М.: Институт Дальневосточных исследований РАН, 2018. 392 с.
- Сазонов С. Проблемы и перспективы интеграции инфраструктуры между Россией и Китаем в рамках концепции «Один пояс, один путь» // Ред. А. О. Виноградов, А. С. Исаев. Россия-Китай: шансы и вызовы новой эпохи. М.: Институт Дальневосточных исследований РАН, 2020.
- Тараканов М. А. Проблемы, история и перспективы транспортных проектов в Арктике // Север и pынок. 2014. № 6(43). С. 23–27. URL: http://www.iep.kolasc.net.ru/journal/files/Sever-i-Rynok-2014–6.pdf#page=23
- Хусаинов Ф. И. и Ожерельева М. В. Фрахт угля и жидких углеводородов железнодорожным транспортом: Текущее состояние и перспективы // Tранспорт Российской Федерации. 2019. № 4. С. 22–27.
- Conley, H. (2018). China’s Arctic Dream. Washington DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
- Doshi, R., A. Dale-Huang & G. Zhang. (2021). Northern Expedition: China’s Arctic Activities and Ambitions. Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/northern-expedition-chinas-arctic-activities-and-ambitions/
- Henderson, J. & Moe, A. (2019). The Globalization of Russian Gas – Political and Commercial Catalysts. Cheltenham U. K.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hsiung, C.W. & Røseth, T. (2019). The Arctic Dimension in Sino-Russian Relations. In J. Bekkevold & B. Lo (Eds.) Sino-Russian Relations in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–92516–5_8
- Hsiung, W.C. (2016). China and Arctic energy: drivers and limitations. The Polar Journal. No. 6 (2). Pp. 243–258.
- Ivanov, I. S. (ed.). (2018). Russian – Chinese Dialogue: The 2018 Model. [RIAC report 39] Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/activity/publications/russian-chinese-dialogue-the-2018-model/
- Jia, Fanqi. & Bennett, Mia M. (2018). Chinese infrastructure diplomacy in Russia: the geopolitics of project type, location, and scale. Eurasian Geography and Economics. No. 59 (3–4). Pp. 340–377. DOI: 10.1080 / 15387216.2019.1571371
- Jones, L. & Zou, Y. (2017). Rethinking the Role of State-Owned Enterprises in China’s Rise. New Political Economy. No. 22 (6). Pp. 743–760. DOI: 10.1080 / 13563467.2017.1321625
- Koivurova, T. and Kopra, S. (2020). Chinese Policy and Presence in the Arctic. Brill Nijhoff.
- Luzyanin, S.G. & Huasheng, Zh. et al. (2020). Russia – China Dialogue: The 2020 Model. [RIAC Report 58] Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/activity/publications/russia-china-dialogue-the-2020-model