DEBATES
Published 2022-04-08
Keywords
- economic history of Russia; economic growth; dynamics of capital assets; innovation economy; ideology; conservatism; Stalinism
How to Cite
1.
Likhomanov И. Are there Grounds for Optimism? (to a Discussion between Two Economists). ECO [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 8 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];52(4):156-67. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4421
Abstract
The paper provides a critical analysis of the article of D. A. Fomin “Three crises of modern economic history of Russia” and the review of this article by V. I. Klistorin, published in the second issue of ECO journal for 2022. In the author’s opinion, the reviewer’s evaluation of the position of D. A. Fomin as a neo-Stalinist, calling to repeat the experience of Soviet modernization of 1930th is too categorical and distracts the reader from the important points of his research. On the other hand, D. A. Fomin himself made a serious methodological mistake, due to which the conclusions of his article turned out to be internally contradictory. A valuable scientific contribution of D. A. Fomin’s research was the identification of additional external sources of the rapid postwar recovery of the Soviet economy in 1945–1948. The assertion that since 2008 Russia’s economy has undergone irreversible changes, which will lead to its stabilization at a different, lower level than today, being controversial, deserves at least a careful critical reflection.References
- Бородкин Л. И. Преемственность и разрывы в экономической истории России XIX–XX вв. // ЭКО. 2021. № 4. С. 8–28.
- Галушка А., Ниязметов А., Окулов М. Кристалл роста. К русскому экономическому чуду. М.: Наше Завтра, 2021. 360 с.
- Сталин И. В. Сочинения. Т. 13. М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1951. С. 236–256.
- Фомин Д. А. Три кризиса новейшей экономической истории России // ЭКО. 2022. № 2. С. 157–184. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2022–2–157–184
- Клисторин В. И. Поле битвы: экономическая история. Комментарий к статье Д. А. Фомина и не только // ЭКО. 2022. № 2. С. 185–192. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2022–2–185–192