ISSN (print) - 0131-7652

ISSN (online) - 2686-7605

Vol. 48 No. 11 (2018)
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION

Science Crowdfunding: Key Motives Тhat Influence Project Participants

PDF (Русский)
  • M. Gordeev
M. Gordeev
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-11-158-170

Published 2018-10-29

Keywords

  • Science crowdfunding,
  • financing of scientist,
  • motivation of participants,
  • Experiment,
  • Planeta

How to Cite

1.
Gordeev М. Science Crowdfunding: Key Motives Тhat Influence Project Participants. ECO [Internet]. 2018 Oct. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 28];48(11):158-70. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/1703

Abstract

Due to limited state resources, allocated for scientific projects in Russia, it is reasonable to consider the attraction of additional financial sources, in particular, via crowdfunding mechanism. The research features specifics of the crowdfunding community: a portrait of an average backer and key motivational factors of the crowdfunding participants. The paper also reveals spheres in which crowdfunding can be applied with the most of efficiency, so that to supplement the existing system of financing science and education in Russia.
PDF (Русский)

References

  3. Миндели Л., Черных С. Проблемы финансирования российской науки // Общество и экономика. 2009. № 1.
  4. Дежина И. Раздел 6.5 Состояние науки и инноваций // Российская экономика в 2016 году. Тенденции и перспективы. (Вып.38) В. Мау и др. / Под ред. С. Г. Синельникова-Мурылева, Радыгина А. Д. Ин-т экон. политики им. Е. Т. Гайдара. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2017. 520 с.
  5. Siva N. Crowdfunding for medical research picks up pace // The Lancet. 2014. Vol. 384, Pp. 1085–1086.
  6. Lorenzo D. S. The place of crowdfunding in the discovery of scientific and social value of medical research // Bioethics. 2017.
  7. Ozdemir V., Faris J. and Srivastava S. Crowdfunding 2.0: the next-generation philanthropy// EMBO report. 2015. Vol. 16. No.3. Pp. 267–271.
  8. Mollick E., Robb A. Democratizing Innovation and Capital Access: The Role of Crowdfunding // California Management Review. 2016. Vol. 58 (2). Pp. 72–87.
  9. Weigmann K. Tapping the crowds for research funding // EMBO report. 2013. Vol. 14. No.12. Pp. 1043–1046.
  10. Howe N., Strauss W. Generations: The History of America’s Future. 1584 to 2069. Harper perennial.1992. Pp. 1584–2069.
  11. Terry H. P., Schwartz D., Sun T. The future of finance. Part 3. The Socialization of Finance// Аналитический отчет. Goldman Sachs. 2015. 62 p.
  12. Borst I., Moser C. and Ferguson J. From friendfunding to crowdfunding: Relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance. New media & society. 2017. Pp. 19.
  13. Giles J. Finding philanthropy: Like it? Pay for it. Nature. 2012. No. 481. Pp. 252–253.