ISSN (print) - 0131-7652

ISSN (online) - 2686-7605

Vol. 46 No. 1 (2016)
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Companies with FDI in Russia: Regional Dimension

PDF (Русский)
  • Ye. Fedorova,
  • A. Nikolaev,
  • A. Levina
Ye. Fedorova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Bio
A. Nikolaev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Bio
A. Levina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2016-1-61-69

Published 2018-07-15

Keywords

  • FDI,
  • EXPORTS,
  • IMPORTS,
  • REGIONAL POLICY,
  • SPILLOVER-EFFECT

How to Cite

1.
Fedorova Е, Nikolaev А, Levina А. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Companies with FDI in Russia: Regional Dimension. ECO [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];46(1):61-9. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/1427

Abstract

The paper assessed the performance of companies with FDI in Russia, taking into account the regional dimension. The methodology includes an enlarged model of the Cobb-Douglass to include horizontal, vertical spillover effects from PII.Empiricheskaya base includes analysis Statements 31 150 companies for 2006-2013 year. The study can be said that regional policy to equalize the socio-economic situation of the subjects of inter-budgetary subsidies by a positive impact on the performance of companies with FDI in economically weak regions. Measures to stimulate imports in the regions are also able to have a beneficial effect on the effectiveness of international and, indirectly, the Russian companies.
PDF (Русский)

References






1.

Российский стат. ежегодник. 2014/Федеральная служба государственной статистики. -М.: ФГСС, 2014.





2.

Driffield N. Regional policy and spillovers from FDI in the UK//The Annals of Regional Science. -2003. -Vol. 38. -P. 579-594.





3.

Armstrong H. W., Taylor J. Regional economics and policy, 2nd ed. Harvester Wheatsheaf. -London, 1993.





4.

Pupato G. Non-market interactions and entry into export markets: an empirical analysis//University of British Columbia, Working paper, 2007.





5.

Krammer M. S. International R&D spillovers in emerging markets: The impact of trade and foreign direct investment//The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. -2010. -Vol. 19. -Iss. 4. -P. 591-623





6.

Aitken B., Harrison A. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment Evidence from Venezuela. -Mimeo, Columbia University, 2004.





7.

Lenaerts K., Marlevede B. Horizontal or backward? FDI spillovers, input-output tables, and industry aggregation. -Fund for Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen), Department of Economics, Ghent University, Tweekenstraat 2, B-9000. -Ghent, Belgium, 2010.





8.

Morgan K. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal//Regional Studies. -1997. -Vol. 31. -P. 491-503.





9.

Wren C., Jones J. Assessing the Regional Impact of Grants on FDI location: Evidence from U. K. Regional Policy, 1985-2005//Journal of Regional Science. -2011. -Vol. 51 (3).





10.

Kneller R., Pisu M. Industrial Linkages and Export Spillovers from FDI//The World Economy. -2007. -Vol. 30. -P. 105-134.