MONITORING OF ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION
Published 2018-07-09
Keywords
- SOCIO-ECONOMIC ADAPTATION,
- BEHAVIOR MODELS,
- SOCIAL RESOURCES,
- RESOURCE POTENTIAL,
- HUMAN CAPITAL
How to Cite
1.
Avraamova Е, Loginov Д. The Population’s Adaptation to the New Economic Reality. ECO [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 9 [cited 2024 Sep. 5];48(6):86-102. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/1215
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the populations adaptation behavior appeared in the period of 2015-2017. The author studies the populations ideas about economic growth perspectives; the level of resources development; current adaptation strategies. The informational base of the study is monitoring research Subjective well-being, conducted annually by INSAP Ranepa in the form of 8 waves of representative surveys with a sample of 1,640 respondents. It is shown that the population perceives the current economic situation without alarmism, but does not see the prospects for its improvement. In such a situation adaptation means getting used to new conditions by reducing consumption standards for the majority of people. Only one fifth of the population has a high resource potential, allowing to create a variety of adaptation strategies, while twice higher number of those who is characterized by the low resource potential. The main adaptation strategy for the group with low resource potential has become the use of a private subsidiary farm. Active forms of adaptation dealt with the implementation of various resources characterize the behavior of the third of the population.References
1.
Авраамова Е. М., Логинов Д. M. Социально-экономическая адаптация: ресурсы и возможности//Общественные науки и современность. 2002. № 5. С. 24-34.
2.
Авраамова Е. М., Малева Т. М. О причинах воспроизводства социально-экономического неравенства: что показывает ресурсный подход?//Вопросы экономики. 2014. № 7. С. 144-160.
3.
Гордон Л. А. Социальная адаптация в современных условиях//Социологические исследования. 1994. № 8-9. С. 3-15.
4.
Заславская Т. И. Социальный механизм трансформации российского общества//Социологический журнал. 1995. № 3. С. 5-21.
5.
Тихонова Н. Е. Динамика социальной стратификации в постсоветском обществе//Общественные науки и современность. 1997. № 5. С. 5-14.
6.
Тихонова Н. Е., Каравай А. В. Ресурсы россиян в условиях кризиса: динамика и роль в адаптации к новым условиям//Социологические исследования. 2016. № 10 (390). С. 43-53.
7.
Becker G. S. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press. 1981.
8.
Berk R. A. The New Home Economics: An agenda for sociological research. In Women and Household Labor, ed. Berk S. F., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
9.
Berk S. F., Berk R.A Supply-side sociology of the family: The challenge of the New Home Economics. Annual Review of Sociology. 1983. No. 9. Pp. 375-395.
10.
Coleman J.S Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology. 1986. No. 91 Pp.1309-1335.
11. England P., Farkas G. (1986) Households, Employment, and Gender. New York: Aldine Marriage, Family Human Capital, and Fertility/ed. Schultz T. W. Suppl. to J. Polit. Econ. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1974.
12. Piirainen T. Towards a New Social Order in Russia: Transforming Structures in Everyday Life. University of Helsinki, 1997.
13. Simon H. Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. Microeconomics: Selected Readings, Ed. by E. Mansfield. New York, 1971.