ISSN (print) - 0131-7652

ISSN (online) - 2686-7605

Vol. 53 No. 4 (2023)
Cover story: The Footsteps of New Industrialization

Assessing the Balance of Regional Development Against the Sustainable Development Goals

PDF (Русский)
  • T.V. Alferova
T.V. Alferova
Реrm State University
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-4-8-24

Published 2023-03-30

Keywords

  • sustainable development; sustainable development goals; SDGs; region; biosphere; balance; Ural Federal District; Volga Federal District

How to Cite

1.
Alferova ТВ. Assessing the Balance of Regional Development Against the Sustainable Development Goals. ECO [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];53(4):8-24. Available from: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4588

Abstract

The study is devoted to testing the methodology for assessing the balance of regional development on the basis of the Sustainable Development Goals. The SDG indices obtained for the regions of the Urals and Volga Federal Districts showed a low level of achievement of target values in almost all regions. In addition, we discovered the predominance of the development of the economic sphere over the social and environmental. This suggests that these regions pay the most attention to economic growth, which does not correspond to the principles of the biosphere-centric paradigm. The low value of the index on SDG 17 indicates insufficient attention to the institutions of governance, which leads to the current situation.
PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Алферова Т. В. Локализация целей устойчивого развития на примере регионов Приволжского и Уральского федеральных округов // ЭКО. 2022. № 10. С. 148–167. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2022–10–148–167
  2. Осипова М. Ю. Теория и методология исследования устойчивого развития социально-экономических систем // Вестник пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Социально-экономические науки. 2014. № 25. С. 81–88.
  3. Тихонова Т. В. Экосистемные услуги: пути практического использования // Проблемы развития территории. 2019. № 1 (99). С. 25–39. DOI: 10.158 38/ptd.2019.1.99.2
  4. Черданцев В. А., Робинсон Б. В. Современные концепции устойчивого развития // Вестник НГУЭУ. 2009. № 2. С. 14–24.
  5. Шкиперова Г.Т., Курило А.Е. Оценка устойчивости региональных социо-эколого-экономических систем // Проблемы рыночной экономики. 2021. № 1. С. 47−61. DOI: 10.33051/2500-2325-2021-1-47-61
  6. Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den. (2000). Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches, and Differences with Environmental Economics January Regional Environmental Change 2(00–080/3). 25р. DOI:10.1007/s101130000020
  7. Bojtor, A., Czippán, K. (2019). The Synergies of the Sustainable Development
  8. Goals and the Good State and Governance Report in Hungary. Available at: https://www.nispa.org/files/conferences/2019/e-proceedings/system_files/papers/thesynergies-bojtor.pdf (accessed 18.10.2022).
  9. Costanza, R., Daly, H.E. (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology. Vol. 6. No. 1. Рp. 37–46.
  10. Dotsenko, E.Y., Ezdina, N.P., Khasanova, A. Sh., Khasanov, M.I. (2021). Modern paradigms of Sustainable Development: Advantages and Disadvantages. E3S Web Conf. International Conference on Efficient Production and Processing (ICEPP-2021) Vol. 247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124701069 (accessed 10.10.2022).
  11. Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A.V., Reyers, B., Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and bio-sphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society. No. 21(3):41. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748–210341 (accessed 20.04.2022).
  12. Lenton, T.M. (2016). Earth system science: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 176р. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198718871.001.0001 (accessed 15.10.2022).
  13. Martinez-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological Economics. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, entry 91008. Available at: http://ecoeco.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/alier_economia_ecologica-1.pdf (accessed 01.11 2022).
  14. Martinez-Alier J., Munda, G., O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics. No. 26. Pp. 277–286.
  15. Munda, G., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (1994). Qualitative multi-criteria evaluation for environmental management. Ecological Economics. No. 10. Pр. 97–112.
  16. Rockström J., Sukhdev P. From MDGs to SDGs: Transition to a Development paradigm of human prosperity within a safe operating space on Earth. Input to 11th Session of the UN OWG. 30th April 2014. Рр.1-10.
  17. Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable Development Report 2022. From Crisis to Sustainable Development: the SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond. Includes the SDG Index and Dashboards. Cambridge University Press. 494 p. Available at: https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/ (accessed 04.08.2022).